blob: 5aa84e6f5bbfd24b46decda78af435cdc0340d17 [file] [log] [blame]
From 7ecbf0c3c3343df0b13e66b52149b1fa2eceeaae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:06:07 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 223/351] cpu_down: move migrate_enable() back
X-NVConfidentiality: public
Commit 08c1ab68, "hotplug-use-migrate-disable.patch", intends to
use migrate_enable()/migrate_disable() to replace that combination
of preempt_enable() and preempt_disable(), but actually in
!CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL case, migrate_enable()/migrate_disable()
are still equal to preempt_enable()/preempt_disable(). So that
followed cpu_hotplug_begin()/cpu_unplug_begin(cpu) would go schedule()
to trigger schedule_debug() like this:
_cpu_down()
|
+ migrate_disable() = preempt_disable()
|
+ cpu_hotplug_begin() or cpu_unplug_begin()
|
+ schedule()
|
+ __schedule()
|
+ preempt_disable();
|
+ __schedule_bug() is true!
So we should move migrate_enable() as the original scheme.
Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
---
kernel/cpu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index a32b15ac586c..05a3f0312014 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -659,6 +659,7 @@ static int _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, int tasks_frozen)
err = -EBUSY;
goto restore_cpus;
}
+ migrate_enable();
cpu_hotplug_begin();
err = cpu_unplug_begin(cpu);
@@ -743,7 +744,6 @@ static int _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, int tasks_frozen)
out_release:
cpu_unplug_done(cpu);
out_cancel:
- migrate_enable();
cpu_hotplug_done();
trace_sched_cpu_hotplug(cpu, err, 0);
if (!err)
--
2.10.1