ARM: ixp4xx: fix ioport_unmap definition
An empty macro definition can cause unexpected behavior, in
case of the ixp4xx ioport_unmap, we get two warnings:
drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/if_cs.c: In function 'if_cs_release':
drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/if_cs.c:826:3: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
ioport_unmap(card->iobase);
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c: In function 'vfio_pci_vga_rw':
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c:230:15: error: the omitted middle operand in ?: will always be 'true', suggest explicit middle operand [-Werror=parentheses]
is_ioport ? ioport_unmap(iomem) : iounmap(iomem);
This uses an inline function to define the macro in a safer way.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khalasa@piap.pl>
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/io.h b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/io.h
index d04d3ec9..844e8ac 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/io.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/io.h
@@ -534,8 +534,15 @@
#endif
}
-#define ioport_map(port, nr) ((void __iomem*)(port + PIO_OFFSET))
-#define ioport_unmap(addr)
+#define ioport_map(port, nr) ioport_map(port, nr)
+static inline void __iomem *ioport_map(unsigned long port, unsigned int nr)
+{
+ return ((void __iomem*)((port) + PIO_OFFSET));
+}
+#define ioport_unmap(addr) ioport_unmap(addr)
+static inline void ioport_unmap(void __iomem *addr)
+{
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_PCI */
#endif /* __ASM_ARM_ARCH_IO_H */