genirq: Adjust irq thread affinity on IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY return value
Jiang Liu [Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:11:33 +0000 (23:11 +0800)]
irq_move_masked_irq() checks the return code of
chip->irq_set_affinity() only for 0, but IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY is
also a valid return code, which is there to avoid a redundant copy of
the cpumask. But in case of IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY we not only avoid
the redundant copy, we also fail to adjust the thread affinity of an
eventually threaded interrupt handler.

Handle IRQ_SET_MASK_OK (==0) and IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY(==1) return
values correctly by checking the valid return values seperately.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Cc: Keping Chen <chenkeping@huawei.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1333120296-13563-2-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

kernel/irq/migration.c

index 4742090..c3c8975 100644 (file)
@@ -43,12 +43,16 @@ void irq_move_masked_irq(struct irq_data *idata)
         * masking the irqs.
         */
        if (likely(cpumask_any_and(desc->pending_mask, cpu_online_mask)
-                  < nr_cpu_ids))
-               if (!chip->irq_set_affinity(&desc->irq_data,
-                                           desc->pending_mask, false)) {
+                  < nr_cpu_ids)) {
+               int ret = chip->irq_set_affinity(&desc->irq_data,
+                                                desc->pending_mask, false);
+               switch (ret) {
+               case IRQ_SET_MASK_OK:
                        cpumask_copy(desc->irq_data.affinity, desc->pending_mask);
+               case IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY:
                        irq_set_thread_affinity(desc);
                }
+       }
 
        cpumask_clear(desc->pending_mask);
 }