sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation.
authorDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:05:22 +0000 (10:05 -0800)
committerRohan Somvanshi <rsomvanshi@nvidia.com>
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:17:23 +0000 (10:17 -0800)
commite37f4d7f467c30109461af53a6ca75308b3338bb
tree243537116c45dc385acb5926fbbd13beeab89fbf
parentfadd5e5a07db923cbee627df77f77aac8106153d
sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation.

[ Upstream commit b1f44e13a525d2ffb7d5afe2273b7169d6f2222e ]

The "(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000" test matches 'restore'
but that is a legitimate place to see the %lo() part of a 32-bit
symbol relocation, particularly in tail calls.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Tested-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Change-Id: I588195deba991fe368241abdc4f270d6d3792e7d
Reviewed-on: http://git-master/r/74205
Reviewed-by: Varun Wadekar <vwadekar@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Varun Wadekar <vwadekar@nvidia.com>
arch/sparc/mm/btfixup.c