btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information
authorMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 07:27:13 +0000 (07:27 +0000)
committerChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:34:27 +0000 (11:34 -0400)
commit2f7e33d432d097a2a7f467b031bf18be91cb3d49
treea1729a436b3c9921390e23cae35e5b837653dfe4
parent9b90f5135320bc74dc6c9a8c74d69fd4821d9282
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information

When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some
delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again,
we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to
initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may
cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the
following oops:

[ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the
insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17)
[ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301!
[SNIP]
[ 5447.790721] Call Trace:
[ 5447.793191]  [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs]
[ 5447.800156]  [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs]
[ 5447.806517]  [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs]
[ 5447.812876]  [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs]
[ 5447.818961]  [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92
[ 5447.824090]  [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b
[ 5447.829133]  [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef
[ 5447.834438]  [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44
[ 5447.841216]  [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67
[ 5447.847846]  [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87
[ 5447.853156]  [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d
[ 5447.859072]  [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80
[ 5447.864636]  [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173
[ 5447.870112]  [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26
[ 5447.875682]  [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10
[ 5447.880882]  [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae
[ 5447.886153]  [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22
[ 5447.891114]  [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Fix it by reusing the old delayed node.

Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.h
fs/btrfs/inode.c