]> nv-tegra.nvidia Code Review - linux-2.6.git/blobdiff - fs/fs-writeback.c
Remove Andrew Morton's old email accounts
[linux-2.6.git] / fs / fs-writeback.c
index 300324bd563c924ae87c10db7d5171726f8bffc1..d0ff0b8cf30988a23ad144f92f8b7543790bbe67 100644 (file)
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
  * pages against inodes.  ie: data writeback.  Writeout of the
  * inode itself is not handled here.
  *
- * 10Apr2002   akpm@zip.com.au
+ * 10Apr2002   Andrew Morton
  *             Split out of fs/inode.c
  *             Additions for address_space-based writeback
  */
 #include <linux/buffer_head.h>
 #include "internal.h"
 
+
+/**
+ * writeback_acquire - attempt to get exclusive writeback access to a device
+ * @bdi: the device's backing_dev_info structure
+ *
+ * It is a waste of resources to have more than one pdflush thread blocked on
+ * a single request queue.  Exclusion at the request_queue level is obtained
+ * via a flag in the request_queue's backing_dev_info.state.
+ *
+ * Non-request_queue-backed address_spaces will share default_backing_dev_info,
+ * unless they implement their own.  Which is somewhat inefficient, as this
+ * may prevent concurrent writeback against multiple devices.
+ */
+static int writeback_acquire(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
+{
+       return !test_and_set_bit(BDI_pdflush, &bdi->state);
+}
+
+/**
+ * writeback_in_progress - determine whether there is writeback in progress
+ * @bdi: the device's backing_dev_info structure.
+ *
+ * Determine whether there is writeback in progress against a backing device.
+ */
+int writeback_in_progress(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
+{
+       return test_bit(BDI_pdflush, &bdi->state);
+}
+
+/**
+ * writeback_release - relinquish exclusive writeback access against a device.
+ * @bdi: the device's backing_dev_info structure
+ */
+static void writeback_release(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
+{
+       BUG_ON(!writeback_in_progress(bdi));
+       clear_bit(BDI_pdflush, &bdi->state);
+}
+
 /**
  *     __mark_inode_dirty -    internal function
  *     @inode: inode to mark
@@ -284,7 +323,17 @@ __sync_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
                                 * soon as the queue becomes uncongested.
                                 */
                                inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
-                               requeue_io(inode);
+                               if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) {
+                                       /*
+                                        * slice used up: queue for next turn
+                                        */
+                                       requeue_io(inode);
+                               } else {
+                                       /*
+                                        * somehow blocked: retry later
+                                        */
+                                       redirty_tail(inode);
+                               }
                        } else {
                                /*
                                 * Otherwise fully redirty the inode so that
@@ -334,9 +383,6 @@ __writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
                WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_WILL_FREE);
 
        if ((wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL) && (inode->i_state & I_SYNC)) {
-               struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
-               int ret;
-
                /*
                 * We're skipping this inode because it's locked, and we're not
                 * doing writeback-for-data-integrity.  Move it to s_more_io so
@@ -345,15 +391,7 @@ __writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
                 * completed a full scan of s_io.
                 */
                requeue_io(inode);
-
-               /*
-                * Even if we don't actually write the inode itself here,
-                * we can at least start some of the data writeout..
-                */
-               spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
-               ret = do_writepages(mapping, wbc);
-               spin_lock(&inode_lock);
-               return ret;
+               return 0;
        }
 
        /*
@@ -386,8 +424,6 @@ __writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
  * WB_SYNC_HOLD is a hack for sys_sync(): reattach the inode to sb->s_dirty so
  * that it can be located for waiting on in __writeback_single_inode().
  *
- * Called under inode_lock.
- *
  * If `bdi' is non-zero then we're being asked to writeback a specific queue.
  * This function assumes that the blockdev superblock's inodes are backed by
  * a variety of queues, so all inodes are searched.  For other superblocks,
@@ -403,11 +439,12 @@ __writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
  * on the writer throttling path, and we get decent balancing between many
  * throttled threads: we don't want them all piling up on inode_sync_wait.
  */
-static void
-sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, struct writeback_control *wbc)
+void generic_sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb,
+                               struct writeback_control *wbc)
 {
        const unsigned long start = jiffies;    /* livelock avoidance */
 
+       spin_lock(&inode_lock);
        if (!wbc->for_kupdate || list_empty(&sb->s_io))
                queue_io(sb, wbc->older_than_this);
 
@@ -479,11 +516,23 @@ sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, struct writeback_control *wbc)
                iput(inode);
                cond_resched();
                spin_lock(&inode_lock);
-               if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0)
+               if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) {
+                       wbc->more_io = 1;
                        break;
+               }
+               if (!list_empty(&sb->s_more_io))
+                       wbc->more_io = 1;
        }
+       spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
        return;         /* Leave any unwritten inodes on s_io */
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(generic_sync_sb_inodes);
+
+static void sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb,
+                               struct writeback_control *wbc)
+{
+       generic_sync_sb_inodes(sb, wbc);
+}
 
 /*
  * Start writeback of dirty pagecache data against all unlocked inodes.
@@ -512,8 +561,7 @@ writeback_inodes(struct writeback_control *wbc)
        might_sleep();
        spin_lock(&sb_lock);
 restart:
-       sb = sb_entry(super_blocks.prev);
-       for (; sb != sb_entry(&super_blocks); sb = sb_entry(sb->s_list.prev)) {
+       list_for_each_entry_reverse(sb, &super_blocks, s_list) {
                if (sb_has_dirty_inodes(sb)) {
                        /* we're making our own get_super here */
                        sb->s_count++;
@@ -524,11 +572,8 @@ restart:
                         * be unmounted by the time it is released.
                         */
                        if (down_read_trylock(&sb->s_umount)) {
-                               if (sb->s_root) {
-                                       spin_lock(&inode_lock);
+                               if (sb->s_root)
                                        sync_sb_inodes(sb, wbc);
-                                       spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
-                               }
                                up_read(&sb->s_umount);
                        }
                        spin_lock(&sb_lock);
@@ -566,9 +611,7 @@ void sync_inodes_sb(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
                        (inodes_stat.nr_inodes - inodes_stat.nr_unused) +
                        nr_dirty + nr_unstable;
        wbc.nr_to_write += wbc.nr_to_write / 2;         /* Bit more for luck */
-       spin_lock(&inode_lock);
        sync_sb_inodes(sb, &wbc);
-       spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -578,10 +621,8 @@ static void set_sb_syncing(int val)
 {
        struct super_block *sb;
        spin_lock(&sb_lock);
-       sb = sb_entry(super_blocks.prev);
-       for (; sb != sb_entry(&super_blocks); sb = sb_entry(sb->s_list.prev)) {
+       list_for_each_entry_reverse(sb, &super_blocks, s_list)
                sb->s_syncing = val;
-       }
        spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
 }
 
@@ -655,7 +696,7 @@ int write_inode_now(struct inode *inode, int sync)
        int ret;
        struct writeback_control wbc = {
                .nr_to_write = LONG_MAX,
-               .sync_mode = WB_SYNC_ALL,
+               .sync_mode = sync ? WB_SYNC_ALL : WB_SYNC_NONE,
                .range_start = 0,
                .range_end = LLONG_MAX,
        };
@@ -747,43 +788,4 @@ int generic_osync_inode(struct inode *inode, struct address_space *mapping, int
 
        return err;
 }
-
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_osync_inode);
-
-/**
- * writeback_acquire: attempt to get exclusive writeback access to a device
- * @bdi: the device's backing_dev_info structure
- *
- * It is a waste of resources to have more than one pdflush thread blocked on
- * a single request queue.  Exclusion at the request_queue level is obtained
- * via a flag in the request_queue's backing_dev_info.state.
- *
- * Non-request_queue-backed address_spaces will share default_backing_dev_info,
- * unless they implement their own.  Which is somewhat inefficient, as this
- * may prevent concurrent writeback against multiple devices.
- */
-int writeback_acquire(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
-{
-       return !test_and_set_bit(BDI_pdflush, &bdi->state);
-}
-
-/**
- * writeback_in_progress: determine whether there is writeback in progress
- * @bdi: the device's backing_dev_info structure.
- *
- * Determine whether there is writeback in progress against a backing device.
- */
-int writeback_in_progress(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
-{
-       return test_bit(BDI_pdflush, &bdi->state);
-}
-
-/**
- * writeback_release: relinquish exclusive writeback access against a device.
- * @bdi: the device's backing_dev_info structure
- */
-void writeback_release(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
-{
-       BUG_ON(!writeback_in_progress(bdi));
-       clear_bit(BDI_pdflush, &bdi->state);
-}